xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: why is log version=1 default?

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: why is log version=1 default?
From: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:41:07 +1000
Cc: Tim Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>, Ed <spied@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <003874.f47b8d00f0d0e5163b2a498c9a81b182.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org>; from cw@f00f.org on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:46:34PM -0700
References: <42A0AE93.6010001@yandex.ru> <20050606151045.P1319708@boing.melbourne.sgi.com> <003874.f47b8d00f0d0e5163b2a498c9a81b182.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Hi Chris,

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:46:34PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:10:45PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
> 
> > The only problem would be if you wanted to mount the filesystem
> > using a linux kernel predating around June 2002 and/or mounting on
> > an IRIX kernel prior to 6.5.26.
> 
> Does IRIX 6.5.26 support v2 directories anyway?
> 
I'm a bit confused by the question - are you confusing v2 directories
with v2 logs perhaps?

v2 directories went in around IRIX 6.5.5mf and became
the default in 6.5.14mf.
v2 logs went into IRIX 6.5.26.

--Tim


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>