xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:18:21 -0500
Cc: Ludek Finstrle <luf@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <433976C5.1000104@xxxxxxx>
References: <20050926071451.GA3751@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4338128F.8000707@xxxxxxx> <20050927163531.GA19652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <433976C5.1000104@xxxxxxx>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
Eric Sandeen wrote:
Ludek Finstrle wrote:

I have problem with diferrence in filesize between ls -l and du -sk
after xfs_fsr (it was ok before running xfs_fsr):

# ls -l Drafts
-rw-rw----  1  user  group  74646  Apr 15 17:37  Drafts
# du -b Drafts
3221303296  Drafts


can you run xfs_bmap -v Drafts

I suppose we should have checked the attribute fork.... any idea if you're using extended attributes?

if you still have a problematic file around, try xfs_bmap with the -a option.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>