xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

To: Ludek Finstrle <luf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:12:55 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
References: <20050926071451.GA3751@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <4338128F.8000707@sgi.com> <20050927163531.GA19652@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <433976C5.1000104@sgi.com> <20050929054410.GA30789@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
Ludek Finstrle wrote:
Do you happen to still have the xfs_repair output in scrollback somewhere?

Here is xfs_repair output. This is much better then previous run.

Could you also please send xfs_info output for the filesystem, to see the fs geometry?


And just out of curiosity, what sort of storage is this on?

Thanks,

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>