[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr
From: Ludek Finstrle <ludek.finstrle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:11:53 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <434A76BB.8080400@sgi.com>
References: <433976C5.1000104@sgi.com> <20050929054410.GA30789@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <434174A7.6010904@sgi.com> <26743c10510031244x726ff508m89ecd0398417e521@mail.gmail.com> <4341E780.70803@sgi.com> <20051004190338.GA15263@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <4342D9F6.8090605@sgi.com> <20051010065023.GA30979@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <434A76BB.8080400@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
> >>Thanks, I appreciate it... we're trying to reproduce it here.
> We've been able to exactly reproduce this in-house now.  Thanks for your 
> help!

It's nice to hear this. May I try something here or it's useless?
I find the way to play with it in work time ... So I can react
more quickly.

My wife is ok but fourteen days before launch space shuttle
(baby born date) ...



P.S. If I can help (e.g. test, debug output, ...) just drop me a note.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>