[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr

To: Ludek Finstrle <ludek.finstrle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ls -l versus du -sk after xfs_fsr
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:31:03 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051011071153.GA7530@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
References: <433976C5.1000104@sgi.com> <20050929054410.GA30789@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <20051001091130.GA15808@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <434174A7.6010904@sgi.com> <26743c10510031244x726ff508m89ecd0398417e521@mail.gmail.com> <4341E780.70803@sgi.com> <20051004190338.GA15263@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <4342D9F6.8090605@sgi.com> <20051010065023.GA30979@soptik.pzkagis.cz> <434A76BB.8080400@sgi.com> <20051011071153.GA7530@soptik.pzkagis.cz>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)
Ludek Finstrle wrote:
It's nice to hear this. May I try something here or it's useless?
I find the way to play with it in work time ... So I can react
more quickly.

I think the problem is well in hand here, look for a fix soon...

My wife is ok but fourteen days before launch space shuttle
(baby born date) ...

Good luck with that! :)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>