[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.19-rc6 : Spontaneous reboots, stack overflows - seems to implica

To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6 : Spontaneous reboots, stack overflows - seems to implicate xfs, scsi, networking, SMP
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 08:31:29 -0600
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dgc@xxxxxxx, jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx, chatz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1164269545.31358.771.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9a8748490611211551v2ebe88fel2bcf25af004c338a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9a8748490611220458w4d94d953v21f7a29a9f1bdb72@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061123011809.GY37654165@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061122.201013.112290046.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061123043543.GI3078@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1164269545.31358.771.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20061025)
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 04:35 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
I would even say 10 function calls deep to allocate file blocks
is overkill, but 22 it just astronomically bad.
Especially since a large part is due to cxfs...

it's a bit sad to see XFS this crippled in linux due to an external,
proprietary module ;(

I understand that cxfs is a bit of a whipping-boy, but the stacks in question in this thread really don't have much if anything to do with the filesystem layering in xfs. They are deep callchains & large functions in core xfs code, it seems.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>