[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate

To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:39:40 +1000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, cmm@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070628181913.GC1674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Aconex
References: <20070614091458.GH5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070614120413.GD86004887@xxxxxxx> <20070614193347.GN5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625132810.GA1951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625134500.GE1951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625150320.GA8686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625214626.GJ5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626103247.GA19870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626153413.GC6652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626231803.GQ31489@xxxxxxx> <20070628181913.GC1674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: nscott@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:49 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > Correct, but for swap files that's not an issue - no user should be
> able
> > too read them, and FA_MKSWAP would really need root privileges to
> execute.
> Will the FA_MKSWAP mode still be required with your suggested change
> of
> teaching do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten extents being in place ?
> Or, will you still like to have FA_MKSWAP mode ? 

There's no need for a MKSWAP flag.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>