Eric Sandeen wrote:
Niv Sardi wrote:
XFS's default mount options are in most cases sub-optimal, we should try
to have more sensible defaults, so far I'm following some quick dave-powered
- version 2 logs
- lazy superblock counters
- less allocation groups for single disk configs
- imaxpct default can be reduced
it is currently 25, what would be reasonable ?
- dropping the ability to turn unwritten extents off completely
please submit your pet-idea for better defaults here.
Sorry for all the replies ;-)
What would you think of a mkfs conf file like e2fsprogs has, which
defines filesystem classes, and defaults for each? (small, news,
It might be interesting if people let us know what non-default
mkfs and mount options that they are using for their various
Didn't Russell C. have some survey years ago - can't remember if
that was for h/ware or what now.
Maybe Dave C. or others have some suggestions from performance runs
for various types of workloads. Do we have this compiled somewhere?