[Top] [All Lists]

***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** Re: Question related to XFS sync , especiall

To: Gopala Krishna <gopalakrishna.n.m@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** Re: Question related to XFS sync , especially fsync
From: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:43:06 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Low
In-reply-to: <d711080c0801140414n48e47140y88f545eba605eff9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <d711080c0801140414n48e47140y88f545eba605eff9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11)
On 14.01.2008 17:44, Gopala Krishna wrote:
> Hi,
> I am seeing some strange problem with XFS and would like to know  the
> expected behavior and if it is faulty is there any patches to resolve the
> problem.
> Problem:
> ======


The man-page "xfs_freeze" at least reads like it does what you want, 
i.e. it flushes everything(tm).

Bis denn

Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>