xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs

To: markgw@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:11:03 -0600
Cc: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <47C89B94.4060002@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <op.t67mtawg3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1204166101.13569.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47C87775.2010007@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C89137.3070805@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C89303.7070902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <47C8997A.9030804@xxxxxxx> <47C89B94.4060002@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
Eric Sandeen wrote:

> maybe just 2 values, with the actual supported features (& features2)
> values anded together?  Easy enough to parse in the code.
> 
> i.e.
> 
> # cat /proc/fs/xfs/features
> 0xffffffff
> 0x00000001

hm, but of course mkfs should never be checking for anything in the
first features slot; yesterday's kernels support all those flags but
don't export anything.

wow, this is starting to feel as complex as ext4's flags ;)

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>