|To:||Marc Dietrich <Marc.Dietrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: filesystem corruption in linus tree|
|From:||Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:23:46 +1100|
|Cc:||Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<03F8FD43-322F-41E3-A7A0-CD4E9AD8B4DE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200802252347.50576.marc.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47C3C20A.90603@xxxxxxx> <200802262100.18631.marc.dietrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 184.108.40.206 (X11/20080213)|
Marc Dietrich wrote:
Hi again, On Tuesday 26 February 2008 08:38:50 Lachlan McIlroy wrote:Marc Dietrich wrote:Hi, On Monday 25 February 2008 01:36:28 Barry Naujok wrote:On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:58:26 +1100, Marc Dietrich <Marc.Dietrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi, somewhere after the release of 2.6.24 my xfs filesystem got corrupted. Initialy I thought it was only related to the readdir bug. (http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-02/msg00027.html) So I waited for the fix to go into mainline. Yesterday I tried again, but got this error during boot:<sniped>We've had a few problems reported with XFS on 32-bit powermacs and the culprit appears to be some changes to bit manipulation routines. Could you please try reverse applying the attached patches and see if the problem is resolved?I saw, that you already pushed it into mainline - for a good reason ;-) Works as expeted.Please also don't forget 2.6.24-stable !
The changes that caused this regression went into 2.6.25-rc1 so no need for a 2.6.24 stable fix.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||PARTIAL TAKE 977823 - fix inode leak in xfs_iget_core(), Lachlan McIlroy|
|Next by Date:||Re: [REVIEW] Don't make lazy counters default for mkfs, Eric Sandeen|
|Previous by Thread:||PARTIAL TAKE 977823 - fix inode leak in xfs_iget_core(), Lachlan McIlroy|
|Next by Thread:||Re: filesystem corruption in linus tree, Marc|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|