xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: review: xfstests/016 change

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: review: xfstests/016 change
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 01:54:46 -0400
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <481E7F17.5090601@xxxxxxx>
References: <481E7F17.5090601@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:29:27PM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> xfstests/016 has been failing for a while in many cases.
> It was relying on the log traffic for create/rm to be unaltered
> in XFS over the life of XFS.
> Its initial purpose was to test out the writing of the log around
> wrapping and checking that as we wrapped we didn't corrupt any data
> after the end of the log.
>
> The patch is to modify xfstest, 016, to take a sampling of the log traffic
> to guestimate how many ops are needed to get to the end of the log,
> instead of hard-coding in how many ops are expected to get there.

I get four rejects out of four hunk when trying to apply this patch,
looks like whitespace-damage.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>