|To:||"Andi Kleen" <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS directory entries sort order|
|From:||"Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:04:56 +1000|
|Cc:||dizzy <dizzy@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<200806101245.09950.dizzy@xxxxxxxxx> <87prqpp5q7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <op.ucj4nqkv3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <484F1541.7010203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Opera Mail/9.24 (Win32)|
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:58:57 +1000, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
readdir order is not dependant on the hashes. The order depends on the order of files being created, unlinked and the length of the filenames being unlinked/created.Thanks for the correction. It's a long time that I read that source so it probably got confused with some other fs.
If I read the code correctly, in node-form directories, it will try and use the same data block that other names with the same hash are located in. Barry.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: Probems with xfs_repair on large filesystem and 32bit OS., Barry Naujok|
|Next by Date:||Returned mail: User unknown (from [188.8.131.52]), Mail Delivery Subsystem|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: XFS directory entries sort order, Andi Kleen|
|Next by Thread:||[XFS] oss.sgi, Oliver Pinter|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|