[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes)

To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Filestreams (and 64bit inodes)
From: Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:47:59 +1200
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <484F2CD7.9070506@xxxxxxx>
References: <484B15A3.4030505@xxxxxxxxxxx> <484CA425.3080606@xxxxxxxxxxx> <484DDDB3.70000@xxxxxxx> <484F0998.90306@xxxxxxxxxxx> <484F2CD7.9070506@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2
Hi Timothy,

Timothy Shimmin wrote:

Ah, the 32 bit inode versus 64 bit inode question :)
I don't have any definitive answers and I'm sure there will be people
on the list with their opinions and experiences.
So just some thoughts...

On balance, I'm thinking the best compromise might be to stay 32 bit and bump the inode size to 2048 bytes.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>