Am Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 schrieb Russell Cattelan:
> Russell Cattelan wrote:
> > Michael Monnerie wrote:
> >> On Mittwoch 28 Januar 2009 Russell Cattelan wrote:
> >>> The sig is there, are you saying it's broken somehow?
> >>> It might have something to do with the html stripper.
> >> Yes, I use kmail (from KDE) which automatically displays mails with
> >> gpg- sigs in different colours to easily see if it's
> >> correct/trusted/wrong. And on this list, my messages all come with
> >> "Invalid Sig".
> > Well I ran a test email through the test list on oss and it seems to
> > work fine.
> > Let try it here then, I'm going to sign this and see if it come back
> > to me with a valid sig.
> Grr try #2
Shown as invalid here - as the signature of Michael. I mentioned this a
few times already to.
Signing this as well, but I expect it will come out as invalid too.
I think it can't be Mailman. As I am on several Mailman mailinglist where
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.