xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4

To: Alessandro Bono <alessandro.bono@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:49 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1234132752.12370.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1234011974.7435.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090208222859.GA2532@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234132752.12370.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:28 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote:
> > > Feb  7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut
> > > here ]------------
> > > Feb  7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at
> > > fs/buffer.c:470!
> > 
> > Per
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-allstable.git;a=blob;f=fs/buffer.c;h=665d446b25bc034241ef54c3c6b1d239c0ccf0f9;hb=d5b562330ec766292a3ac54ae5e0673610bd5b3d
> > 
> > line 470 in fs/buffer.c of 2.6.28.4 has a comment and no actual code.
> > 
> > What additional patches do you have applied?
> > 
> 
> vanilla kernel
> no additional patches at all

Well, the 2.6.28.4 clearly doesn't have a bug there.  Can you
attach the fs/buffer.c you built the kernel from?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>