On 23:59 Sun 08 Feb 2009, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:10:33 Brandon Philips wrote:
> I believe it's a good start; we probably want to merge the trees eventually.
> The way how you have moved libmisc breaks the tarballs though; I have fixed
Thanks. But, what do you mean by break the tarballs?
> Also, I was surprised that your repository has all the history
> rewritten instead of merging Christoph's trees, so I redid the merge.
I used git-stitch-repo to rewrite the history as if they had been in
the same tree. This has the advantage that you can go:
`git log acl/setfacl/setfacl.c`
and have the whole history. Either way is fine with me though.
> Are you fine with this tree?
They look good to me.
> Sorry for being slow. I will first add the other acked distro patches, then
> look at your changes.
Great. Can we set a precedent that as patches get merged an email gets
sent to xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx still? If not I will just rss2email the git