xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_repair after reboot refuse repair my filesystem

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs_repair after reboot refuse repair my filesystem
From: "Vitaly V. Ch" <vitaly.v.ch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 05:05:45 +0000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MyTWMj8UPrRbtmfFGcIfsofOzE2wEwrFCpRrOOYP6fU=; b=Pjh1TxGDpkHvS4uk0Nm02KQei9RnTmjGX1hRfDXWIKKA+VOrtoETsQ+CJNjkXU6kZG AHpXfqJ+hNlq4VZe1Zh1LKDitzgaM/aM4ztBTrIDhgju7/4X+22P2xPYeXgUTAwOaVE5 c0WrtymzLFdgEu8qKNletZsguXg29bAWt6Jjo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TUgY4fmBSLENhj9seJjt21ro4h4BVqNcT55BZ4Gs83OvNN7Xj/3Et69DHVdSea0Lkt td8jLDqpAeULSaqkX8uHzZrrvh60/03dPHIvz7yeer8D3w4Uu/9SiMXUQSlAp4kzvuX5 Iffu14StM5zvCBQMKEcQFP+FQueyvnvIjtERY=
In-reply-to: <4A11E27B.3010708@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6efe08af0905130010g5e21f4d1w9efb4ed200b5b152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A0B0A71.5010609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <6efe08af0905140150g623d5564i5f5a06b5bf8543a5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6efe08af0905150135q317d3b7dy37907332c02510c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A0F0325.8000908@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4A11E27B.3010708@xxxxxxxxxxx>
HI

at now I get my data repaired. By default configure enable DEBUG mode.
I force NDEBUG mode and xfs_repair successfully repair my data.

\\wbr Vitaly Chernookiy

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> Is that the first repair of the image?  When I repair it on my box it
>> finds many more errors, and does not trip the assert.  I tested 3.0.1 in
>> fedora rawhide on x86 this time ...
>>
>> -Eric
>
> Oh, well, I'm dumb; the asserts do nothing unless you build with DEBUG
> on (as I guess you must have... they are off by default, as they are on
> my build) - I'll try to find some time to look into it.
>
> -Eric
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>