xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BUG REPORT: XFS LOG FORWARD COMPATIBILITY PROBLEM

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: XFS LOG FORWARD COMPATIBILITY PROBLEM
From: Eddy Zhao <eddy.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:45:25 +0800
Cc: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OJ/VJlfRhHdRgix6mW9qhfl9MGlHlGXa7EIL/08vzKA=; b=fkfNJqT/AL30BMFCcftfX+leqiXzpI/Odh098lZhHv1BnYWgniXH5p4jjNr6blk0mu /MDb7a49G9K5qGQl1Nl7NcCQ1rs8+fhxnV5fnly576ECAUsAjoOK3zp/rDGPV/WYcezy RFTsOc01Knr2QE6Zxo0Y/aWsE/r0Yv34poG+I=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nqNzorsKvHFtIIM7NavoVwiXBkHVy+iUI2X3egA8l8CkZF9KwruI6RP3ikBou3V4xz dLkFBxcJwn85jav2qM6hChb0DsQaalUuzoOSuI1fi4biwCsell7TJ5ck4tdaTy+x99Iz oemXc+6Qv4U/bQGgbj3wKCzhCYbrhW2rTZfLE=
In-reply-to: <b094161c0907290512q26efb74jc31f72ff7971210b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <362522677.1010811248671789619.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1938435153.1010831248671852499.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b094161c0907280550y58cde45fja97b2c413c92a8d4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A6F0978.4070709@xxxxxxxxxxx> <b094161c0907280759w6c525201vd4a17e22a8c1d582@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A6F20D0.4050303@xxxxxxxxxxx> <b094161c0907290512q26efb74jc31f72ff7971210b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Replay arm eabi log on ia32 machine "seems" success (mount "successfully" returns). Actually I guess that's because 2.6.28 XFS running on ia32 misinterprets unpacked xfs_inode_log_format produced by arm as xfs_inode_log_format_64. And there must be something silently goes wrong on disk after replaying the log.
>
 
Forget this. There's no misinterpretation. Should be
 
"Replay arm eabi log on ia32 machine success (mount successfully returns). 2.6.28 XFS running on ia32 interprets unpacked xfs_inode_log_format produced by arm as xfs_inode_log_format_64"
 
Sorry for patch myself repeatedly : )
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>