xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400
Cc: Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4A80291D.6020200@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A80291D.6020200@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> > This looks good Eric.
> > 
> > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota
> > enforcement too?
> 
> I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do
> a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well.

Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>