|To:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim|
|From:||Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:15:42 +0200|
|Cc:||Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 18.104.22.168 (Windows/20090812)|
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:27:21PM +0200, Tommy van Leeuwen wrote:Hello All, We had this error reported on the list about 1 or 2 months ago. During that time a lot of fixes were applied. However, we still experience this problem with the recent 2.6.31 tree. We've also applied an extra log entry to aid in debugging. printk("XFS: inode_init_always failed to re-initialize inode\n"); However, we didn't see this logging!Can you try the patch below, its does two things - remove all that reclaimable flagging if we reclaim the inode directly. This removes any possibility of racing with the reclaiming thread. - adds asserts if one of the reclaim-related flags is already set.
Update: We've applied this patch on 2 servers. They didn't crash until now. Today we've applied the patch on 6 other servers.
We'll keep you posted. -Patrick
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||[PATCH 9/9] fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c: Use %pU to print UUIDs, Joe Perches|
|Next by Date:||XFS Question, Shue, David CTR USAF AFMC AFRL/RITB|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim, Christoph Hellwig|
|Next by Thread:||Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim, Christoph Hellwig|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|