|To:||Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64|
|From:||Stuart Rowan <strr-debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:14:44 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:18.104.22.168pre) Gecko/20090915 Thunderbird/3.0b4|
Michael Monnerie wrote, on 01/10/09 11:44:
On Donnerstag 01 Oktober 2009 Stuart Rowan wrote:umount /tmp/$from ; /sbin/lvremove -f /dev/$vgroup/snap-shot ; rmdir /tmp/$fromWhy don't you umount /tmp/$from&& /sbin/lvremove -f /dev/$vgroup/snap-shot&& rmdir /tmp/$from from your script so this won't happen again? Or make a loop around umount? mfg zmi
Thanks, I've changed it as you suggested. It's true a second call to umount does unmount it (well it disappears from /proc/mounts anyway).
However lvremove still does not succeed because it still believes the volume to be open.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64, Stuart Rowan|
|Next by Date:||[PATCH] xfststests 220: test for prealloc/delalloc/reserved space recapture, Eric Sandeen|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64, Stuart Rowan|
|Next by Thread:||RE: Two XFS involving stack traces from Debian's 2.6.26-2-amd64, Michael Monnerie|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|