xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Jfs-discussion] benchmark results

To: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] benchmark results
From: lakshmi pathi <lakshmipathi.g@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:49:19 +0530
Cc: tytso@xxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Grandi <pg_jf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ext-users <ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SIzMLM3rTC3FUnrezoHWK4qTo+FghuS/F+STwwwMPdo=; b=iX5+e9d5u+9vT1egZiRnqUNh+Kre+wHVC8RYH5a8CrxcbP9B7zQHmWpcbhSupXQpXz QFPszC8ktnqnzoTCdMrjqO1naba/XFa2pEfT0TtJ9bcDwuOgIlBekZAj/5P5kWTx0EVk ZeWkvrCZ8hL22mtS2pfjzAxch0eLmkE6f2CiE=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=D3YvEOTq36RDa14jH95ah4GWL5Vmyx2VWfcua2/xveOOOKqO+EfaMo51YyDSH77urz pX4ruM9l+976Z1B3TrXzuRdofAMnFIb14HQN9/7zhNJRYK1KtXKvzGgxr7gbs6ZbbNMO fRXjrj9/pS0g9iNflvFERQGfM0blPUvLHgoek=
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912241739160.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912240205510.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19251.26403.762180.228181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091224212756.GM21594@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912241739160.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm a file system testing newbie, I have a  question/doubt,please let
me know if i'm wrong.

Do you think a tool, which uses output from "hdparm" command,to get
hard drives maximum  performance and compares it specific file system
(say for example,"ext4 provides xx throughput against max. device
throughput yy" ) would be more meaningful.

Does using hdparm (or other device throughput related tools) for
benchmarking will be useful?

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Lakshmipathi.G
www.giis.co.in

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>