xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in
From: Khelben Blackstaff <eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:46:30 +0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; bh=ANIuWHc5io/eTImLjAs+jxMPxJD6RKhwBI68PIu/Imo=; b=qvKQIvUBOW0TMBJMD2Za0243V4KwoZmpVQAL6QAul7PkKHmzs0PrElVgqFz/9Oakuz ql0sRJuPB48q427oXyPn+HjDtuAtz4Us5qy8rHKONx3VLNkjh4fGTuicN8ZwzUyazl52 lHz5AmSeVyF5Xklm7/6g394wTwhN+36IBzJOI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=tJnZbL8XmuZOssGtbuSiYifZQK6PFMvXhMVK/z5Nlxz2s3jwAEiVGhkEtHnddF3MpG WW8e3F+0R2jSnDTQMDu73NuuuxE4a/LtlqegJHprghRCY9/n8ZDhQgGQ0GZM5LRNBjPC L0ajPsKCiQKAP3ubvq/0bRkHO/sSX5Grcp5BI=
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; )
> I'm pleased to state that using the experimental "delaylog" mount option 
> (in vanilla linux-2.6.35) we measured a 17% performance increase
> for our benchmark scenario. (Other mount-options in use both before
> and after the "delaylog" option: noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier)

> That's a lot given that XFS was the fastest performing file-system
> for this application already.

> So thanks to all contributing developers for this significant optimization!

I did a benchmark (a simple copy/untar not something fancy) some time ago
and also noticed great improvement.

Here is my post with the results of the benchmark.
http://lordkhelben.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/xfs-delayed-logging/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>