xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:05:35 +0200
In-reply-to: <201008121346.30760.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <201008121346.30760.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.35-zmi; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Donnerstag, 12. August 2010 Khelben Blackstaff wrote:
> Here is my post with the results of the benchmark.
> http://lordkhelben.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/xfs-delayed-logging/
 
Wow, BTRFS rocks. I guess I'll use it once it's released. But I'm 
stunned that XFS is that much slower than ext4 in many tests.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>