xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [META-LIST] Now: perennial "reply-to-all"

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [META-LIST] Now: perennial "reply-to-all"
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 07:32:02 +0200
In-reply-to: <4C68F8AE.2010006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <201008131300.40536@xxxxxx> <201008152052.59870@xxxxxx> <4C68F8AE.2010006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.35-zmi; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Montag, 16. August 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Why does "everyone" on this list "reply-to-all" when 99% of the time
>  it is totally unnecessary, redundant, and potentially ruffles a
>  sender's feathers, as in this case?
 
I'm also on several lists, but the only list where reply-to-all is used 
is this one - so I followed the way it's done here without having 
questioned why.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>