xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Best filesystems ?

To: pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi)
Subject: Re: Best filesystems ?
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:16:39 +0200
Cc: Linux XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <19651.9652.631329.903552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Intellique
References: <4CBE2403.8070108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101019234217.GD12506@dastard> <19646.55189.843933.481529@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101021020009.GG12506@dastard> <19648.27859.799400.168394@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010211258070.24449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19651.9652.631329.903552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Le Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:13:08 +0100 vous écriviez:

> Its major limitation are internal complexity and should
>   only be used on 64b systems. It can support single filesystems
>   larger than 10-15TB, but that's stretching things.

I currently take care of 100 servers with 20 to 80 TB XFS filesystems.
Most are under heavy use, 95% filled for more than 3 years in a row,
etc. I can safely affirm that XFS is definitely safe for anything up to
80 TB.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |   <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>