xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:22:47 +0200
Cc: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20101027121240.4e8ca83a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4CC67450.9020602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC6B56B.7020007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101026132505.6af29d5d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201010270124.44846@xxxxxx> <20101027080454.31a59a3c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC7CDF6.3080405@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101027120628.7b4b2e20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CC7FA39.4030502@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101027121240.4e8ca83a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20101006 Thunderbird/3.0.9
> Yes, the initiator values are more important here. Basically, the
> iscsitarget service should transmit the initiator's requests as they
> come.
What do you mean by this sentence? Sorry no native english speaker.


Am 27.10.2010 12:12, schrieb Emmanuel Florac:
Le Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:08:57 +0200
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG<s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  écrivait:

I'm having 2.6.32 Kernel not 2.6.23 :-) Upgrade works fine yesterday.

OK your values are for the iscsi_target right? Should i use the SAME
values on the iscsi connector side?

Yes, the initiator values are more important here. Basically, the iscsi
target service should transmit the initiator's requests as they come.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>