xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstest run result on 2.6.35.13 X86, 51 test cases failed
From: Ajeet Yadav <ajeet.yadav.77@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:08:59 +0530
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tX+M+l4XjCOSu01yBsLCgcS/1X7mDwFuNdxA0JXxFeQ=; b=LV/o9oJ8he35xLQVtZaqxclNhZ3osyM7FA7MR/ZgpiO94zebH4Hu2VHfkKygHaVO2M 4tYMFJV7plvyTz8dnWlbw2Fxdj0pEr+gnG5rfTxUxKYzjZ+pRG5s1y1lUp/fxLMAmVcZ Lh293AH+z0lnBSjuIL26pyAz+uyDkESAWVbdI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PEgzRQTAS7vE2ihKv2HgXmmgSt8zYSxNavNxjAf4kWAW9xdsWh2CPIRsoXWxuGNvic vvUjaE/wkJvtUIcp+PqXzRKHAQfCDLvL50dLI3SAgnA+zggDFieED7C/Ia1wizNaiwqa abx6qA52/4J2jpWFi0Haby3KpnDteWA5UTUQs=
In-reply-to: <20110613141324.GC32466@dastard>
References: <BANLkTinCvmt+=ZO9HwUWda1vkmLEqOfSwg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110613141324.GC32466@dastard>
Hello,
I better to send the xfstest log as attachment becuase of it large size

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:16:02PM +0530, Ajeet Yadav wrote:
>> Dear All.
>> I have installed the 2.6.35.13 long term valilla kernel release
>> (www.kenrel.org) on my Intel core 2 duo PC, and run 11-05-2011 xfstest
>> version, and run on it, below is the list of fails test cases.
>> As far as I know community uses xfstest for QA, seeing so many fails,
>> I am bit worried.
>
> It shouldn't fail very many tests at all...
>
>> Can anyone hepl me know that why so many fails, is I missed some
>> config option ? or these test cases are not applicable ? or there is
>> someting else
>
> Well, without telling us why the tests are failing (i.e. copy all
> the output rather than just telling us some tests failed) we have no
> idea what the failures you are seeing are. Without some indication
> of what they failures are nobody can really comment on your
> situation....
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

Attachment: 08_06_11_log
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>