xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: suse xfs patches

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: suse xfs patches
From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:05:50 -0500
Cc: neilb@xxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110614201238.GA17586@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20110614201238.GA17586@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:12:38PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Neil, hi Goldwyn,
> 
> if you find issue with XFS and commit local patches to the SLES tree
> it would be very much appreciated if you could actually send them
> upstream, including an explanation of what you are running into.
> 

Yes sure. I suppose you are refering to the patch attached.
I did not send it upstream because the upstream code had taken a
different approach and the patch was relevant to the SLES kernel
tree only.

FWIW, SGI was involved.

The upstream commits were 90810b9e82a36c3c57c1aeb8b2918b242a130b26 and
ff57ab21995a8636cfc72efeebb09cc6034d756f

-- 
Goldwyn

Attachment: xfs-make-xfsbufd-less-aggressive.patch
Description: Text Data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>