xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC

To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: add a new test that runs fsstress under ENOSPC conditions
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:06:35 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8739e6z2gb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <1319849297-3506-8-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111102195357.GA22500@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8739e6z2gb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 12:36:36AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Strange... this means that parent process died unexpectedly.
> Works fine fore me. In my case this happen once due to unknown
> options(new opt " -fsetattr=1" passed to fsstress explicitly) because i've
> forget to rebuilt fsstress via make. Can you please explicitly rebuild,
> and check one more time to be 100% sure.

Oh, looks like it wanted the setattr option.  I held back all the new
features for now until we figure if we want them for existing tests.

I've applied and pushed out the first three patches for now, the others
should follow as soon as I've decided on what to do with new operations.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>