xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:48:29 +0900
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=4dxdckXibnctSAsulXLAIfaLSvU=; b=DZAZEIiqiH4iou+kpTG+MYadZy6n 9QiUKcfXuJip+w7khJ8d6x+WYHN91QrObuXgzPe/2x0p7IueOyvHIb+5FycPiY7B JpYshJu93rCyFK0M9CO0Xr+hTWJeOVIp7ORbkTmHbAzW7+ZXlVxGNmSG/95vMYS8 /L5LjG1rVx2EuUM=
In-reply-to: <20111128110043.GA13766@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1322084293-23557-1-git-send-email-bpm@xxxxxxx> <20111128110043.GA13766@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for
> > 3.1-stable.  Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for
> > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1.
> > 
> > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.  Apologies to those who
> > got this mail twice. 
> 
> The updates looks good to me.

I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't
see them anywhere.

confused,

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>