xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:40:18 +0900
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=935+SBSDTyHAdizZ09ib8pFyxI4=; b=nOVSEEsy30/hyxniirVB6AOJaX00 /A2XTdzMSAGi1ZvKAB1f99JTNYWYQlctdPm53YZ6OIfT6KJAQfVepTPoxy97zC7d Z8VuYoFjSrDoF0eF6+x5qhyDGU7L22ha1LFagy23jdjPQt0Tpv7xZQIw7euKLapW ttwKPNfo35LJfb8=
In-reply-to: <20111128165418.GR29840@xxxxxxx>
References: <1322084293-23557-1-git-send-email-bpm@xxxxxxx> <20111128110043.GA13766@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128134829.GC21041@xxxxxxxxx> <20111128165418.GR29840@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:54:18AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Greg,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:48:29PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important 
> > > > for
> > > > 3.1-stable.  Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph 
> > > > submitted for
> > > > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 
> > > > 3.1.
> > > > 
> > > > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.  Apologies to 
> > > > those who
> > > > got this mail twice. 
> > > 
> > > The updates looks good to me.
> > 
> > I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't
> > see them anywhere.
> 
> The first time I sent this 3.1.y series you were not on the --to=, which
> is why some people got the series twice but you didn't.  Sorry for the
> confusion. 

Was stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the to: line?  If so, I should have seen
them through that, but I don't, which is worrysome to me.

> Do you need the series for 3.0 to be resubmitted?

The 3.0 series is already in the last 3.0.11 release, so I don't need
them, I think I need the 3.1 patches, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>