|To:||Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?|
|From:||Linda Walsh <xfs@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:03:40 -0800|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:188.8.131.52) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/184.108.40.206 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666|
Peter Grandi wrote:
* XFS has several limitations on 32b kernels. Just make sure you have a 64b kernel.
---- I was unaware that the block size was larger on 64b kernels. Is that what you are referring to ? (would be nice)... One thing I have a Q on -- you (OP), said this was an 'iscsi' box? That means hookup over an network, right? You are planning on using a 10Gbit or faster network fabric, right? a 1Gb ethernet will only get you 125MB/s max... doesn't take much tuning to hit that speed.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: concurrent direct IO write in xfs, Linda Walsh|
|Next by Date:||NotificaciÃn webmaster!!â , Webmaster ActualizaciÃn Departamento|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?, Michael Monnerie|
|Next by Thread:||Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?, Peter Grandi|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|