xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: sparsify - utility to punch out blocks of 0s in a file

To: Ron Yorston <rmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: sparsify - utility to punch out blocks of 0s in a file
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:36:39 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201202050933.q159XQpB026380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4F2D8F30.3090802@xxxxxxxxxx> <201202050933.q159XQpB026380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
On 2/5/12 3:33 AM, Ron Yorston wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> Now that ext4, xfs, & ocfs2 can support punch hole, a tool to
>> "re-sparsify" a file by punching out ranges of 0s might be in order.
>>
>> I'll see if util-linux wants it after it gets beat into shape.
>> (or did a tool like this already exist and I missed it?)
> 
> Way ahead of you.  I wrote my sparsify utility for ext2 in 2004:
> 
>    http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/uml/sparsify.html

Cool, I had not known about that one.  But that one is a bit less generic -
ext2-specific and requiring an unmounted fs, right?

> It's mostly of historical interest now, I suppose.  The sparsify utility
> doesn't work on ext4 and I long since gave up maintaining the kernel
> patch.  I still use the zerofree utility, though.
> 
> It would be nice to have a modern version of sparsify.  I'll try it out.

Thanks!

Matthias' suggestion of adding SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA makes very good sense too.
I should also untie the read/zero buffer size from the minimum hole size,
we should do optimal IO sizes regardless of the minimum hole size desired...

-Eric
 
> Ron

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>