Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list fam); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from nycsmtp4out-eri0.rdc-nyc.rr.com (nycsmtp4out-eri0.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.99.227]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id hBFFWrTa007025 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:32:54 -0800 Received: from darthvader.nyc.rr.com (66-108-232-60.nyc.rr.com [66.108.232.60]) by nycsmtp4out-eri0.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.10/Road Runner SMTP Server 1.0) with ESMTP id hBFFWPcw006428; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:32:25 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Stefan Teleman Reply-To: steleman@nyc.rr.com Organization: Disorganized To: Michael Raymond Subject: Re: FAM 2.6.9 Solaris port Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:27:32 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Rolf Sponsel , fam@oss.sgi.com References: <20031121155043.F151992@goliath.americas.sgi.com> <200312141511.45563.steleman@nyc.rr.com> <20031215073933.C11556@goliath.americas.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031215073933.C11556@goliath.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200312151027.32384.steleman@nyc.rr.com> X-archive-position: 200 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: fam-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: steleman@nyc.rr.com Precedence: bulk X-list: fam I can definitely do this for 2.7.0 when i get back from vacation -- i'm leaving tomorrow, will be back on the 23rd, and still have a few vacation days left, so i will have time to do this :-) --Stefan ------ On Monday 15 December 2003 08:39, Michael Raymond wrote: > I'm definitely interested. If you can provide a tested diff > against 2.7.0 I'll let you check it in to SourceForge CVS. You can > get 2.7.0 off the oss.sgi.com page or from SourceForge's CVS > server. > Thanks, > Michael > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 04:11:45PM -0400, Stefan Teleman wrote: > > Hi! > > > > If you are still interested, Jim Hranicky at University of > > Florida was kind enough to make available some online space for > > my port of fam-2.6.9: > > > > ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/incoming > > > > I uploaded the source code package yesterday afternoon. > > > > Happy Holidays, > > > > --Stefan > > > > ----- > > > > On Friday 21 November 2003 17:37, Rolf Sponsel wrote: > > > Great to se that FAM is begining to come to life again! :-) > > > > > > A question though - what about the support for Solaris? > > > > > > I recall Stefan Teleman, elected maintainer of KDE for Solaris, > > > having done some stuff to improve FAM on the Solaris plattform. > > > > > > Has this, his work, managed to get into the 2.7.0 release. > > > If not - I think it should (or are you of other opinion > > > Stefan?) > > > > > > Please see email attached below: > > > > > > Kind Regards > > > > > > / Rolf Sponsel > > > > > > Michael Raymond wrote: > > > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/fam/download/testing/fam-2.7.0-pre > > > >2.ta r.gz > > > > > > > > I've updated the pre-release of 2.7 to build correctly on > > > > IRIX using the Freeware tools. Please try this out. If > > > > there's no objections I'll push this out as the official > > > > release next week on SourceForge and we can open up CVS for > > > > new work. Thanks, Michael -- > > > > Michael A. Raymond > > > > Core OS Scheduling Group Real-Time Lead > > > > > > - - - - - - - - A t t a c h m e n t - - - - - - - - > > > > > > Subject: Re: [kde-solaris] KDE & Sun GNOME > > > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:27:25 -0400 > > > From: Stefan Teleman > > > Organization: Disorganized > > > To: "For people using KDE on Solaris, with questions > > > about KDE or Solaris" , > > > Rolf Sponsel > > > > > > > > > > > > I will gladly make the FAM port sources and a FAM Sun pkg > > > available. > > > > > > It's FAM in filesystem polling mode for now, but it is very > > > fast. The performance improvement compared to KDE filesystem > > > polling is about 3x. > > > > > > I am in the middle of porting it to kernel async callback mode, > > > and i am about half-way through. This has to be done right, > > > otherwise all hell breaks loose. :-) > > > > > > I have been running it on my Sun box (Solaris 8) since early > > > May, and it has not shown any problems at all. My current > > > (development) build of KDE 3.1.2 uses FAM, and the next Solaris > > > release of KDE will definitely use FAM. > > > > > > If someone would be so kind and point me to the right direction > > > as to whom to contact regarding FAM, i would greatly appreciate > > > it! I would be very happy to provide the FAM project with the > > > Sun pkg's and the Solaris port source. > > > > > > --Stefan > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 17:17, Rolf Sponsel wrote: > > > > Lars Tunkrans wrote: > > > > > [... SNIP ...] > > > > > > > > > > Some of them like FAM and MAD depends on Gcc > > > > > extensions and are also very linux dependent . > > > > > so I have skipped FAM but build MAD with GCC. > > > > > > > > > > Stefan has mentioned that He ported FAM to > > > > > solaris , It would be great to get hold of that > > > > > port ! > > > > > > > > > > [... SNIP ...] > > > > > > > > > > //Lars > > > > > > > > I agree, that's great! :-) > > > > > > > > I'd suggest Stefan feeds his work back to the FAM project so > > > > that his efforts become integrated into the next release of > > > > the product (and maybe politely ask for a "quick" patched FAM > > > > 2.6.11 release). > > > > > > > > But I'm not quite sure what "has ported FAM to solaris" > > > > means? > > > > > > > > Has Stefan patched FAM 2.6.10 with the findings we spotted > > > > when compiling FAM on Solaris (and also have reported back > > > > via the FAM mailing list) or has he (you Stefan) managed to > > > > implement a kernel monitor for Solaris so that it works > > > > without having to poll the file system periodically? That > > > > would even be greater! > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > -- > > Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition' > > steleman@nyc.rr.com -Monty Python -- Stefan Teleman 'Nobody Expects the Spanish Inquisition' steleman@nyc.rr.com -Monty Python