Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list kdb); Tue, 01 Jul 2003 20:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tolkor.sgi.com ([198.149.18.6]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h623BU2x022571 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:11:30 -0700 Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by tolkor.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with SMTP id h623SwmO029868 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:29:01 -0500 Received: from kao2.melbourne.sgi.com (kao2.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.180]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA17615 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:10:05 +1000 Received: by kao2.melbourne.sgi.com (Postfix, from userid 16331) id 1A2B9D84FE; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:10:05 +1000 (EST) Received: from kao2.melbourne.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kao2.melbourne.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17709912D6 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 13:10:05 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: kdb@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Proposed change of kdb key on serial console In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:53:51 +0800." <37FBBA5F3A361C41AB7CE44558C3448E5A2F16@pdsmsx403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 13:10:00 +1000 Message-ID: <4102.1057115400@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> X-archive-position: 399 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: kdb-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: kdb-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kaos@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: kdb On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:53:51 +0800, "Zhang, Sonic" wrote: > I think it will cost too many keys to trap into KDB from a serial >console. > > What do you think about "ctrl-=" or "ctrl-\"? That is deliberate, it should take more effort to get into the debugger than just hitting a single character. SGI have been using KDB internally for several months and it has not caused any problems.