Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S42213AbQF0Qak>;
	Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:30:40 -0700
Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:263 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru")
	by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id <S42208AbQF0Qab>;
	Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:30:31 -0700
Received: (from kuznet@localhost) by ms2.inr.ac.ru (8.6.13/ANK) id UAA13199; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:30:04 +0400
From:   kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Message-Id: <200006271630.UAA13199@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection
To:     dyp@perchine.com (Denis Perchine)
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2000 20:30:03 +0400 (MSK DST)
Cc:     davem@redhat.com, ak@muc.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <00062723125606.00490@dyp> from "Denis Perchine" at Jun 27, 0 11:07:47 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Length: 484       
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing

Hello!

> No.... Don't do it... At least I can write workaround with comment:
> /*
>   Just to make this buggy Linux happy :-((((
> */

OK.


Let me to reproduce.

> > You wrote to dead socket, right? It is the hardest error.



> Now I start to understand why BSD people hate Linux... 

Guy, before all your program is buggy.

You could tell "thank you" to people who have lost time
explaining you this. And you could thank also OS, which
allowed to expose this _fatal_ bug.

Alexey