Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553908AbRBPUQV>;
	Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:16:21 -0800
Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:9222 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru")
	by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id <S553881AbRBPUP7>;
	Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:15:59 -0800
Received: (from kuznet@localhost) by ms2.inr.ac.ru (8.6.13/ANK) id XAA07506; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:15:45 +0300
From:   kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Message-Id: <200102162015.XAA07506@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Subject: Re: syncookie monsters ?
To:     ppetru@ppetru.net (Petru Paler)
Date:   Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:15:45 +0300 (MSK)
Cc:     netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <20010216213948.F1900@ppetru.net> from "Petru Paler" at Feb 16, 1 09:39:48 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;netdev-outgoing
Content-Length: 154
Lines: 8

Hello!

> So they have no use in defeating SYN flood attacks ?

Sorry? They are useful for this, only for this. Otherwise,
why to enable them? 8)

Alexey