Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 14 May 2003 12:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pizda.ninka.net (IDENT:root@pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4EJJ8Fu013626
	for <netdev@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 14 May 2003 12:19:08 -0700
Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18823;
	Wed, 14 May 2003 12:18:06 -0700
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20030514.121806.41651014.davem@redhat.com>
To: ak@suse.de
Cc: olh@suse.de, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: comment about struct tcp_tw_bucket in struct sock
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030514083236.GD8290@Wotan.suse.de>
References: <20030513210541.GA4415@suse.de>
	<20030513.163150.28800008.davem@redhat.com>
	<20030514083236.GD8290@Wotan.suse.de>
X-FalunGong: Information control.
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-archive-position: 2523
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: davem@redhat.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: netdev

   From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
   Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:32:36 +0200

   On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:31:50PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
   > It's documented in tcp.h already.
   
   Just not everybody changing sock.h also reads tcp.h :-(

You assume that protocols in the tree are the only thing
that might break if you edit struct sock.