Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:04:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from pizda.ninka.net (IDENT:root@pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id h9SG4I25014204 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:04:20 -0800 Received: (from davem@localhost) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA13730; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:57:47 -0800 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:57:47 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] DECNET: Compaq => HP Message-Id: <20031028075747.23ea54b8.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031029.004659.91579816.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20031029.004659.91579816.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 1068 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: davem@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:46:59 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > More document update: Compaq was bought by HP... I think it's more appropriate to mention both Compaq and HP, right?