Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Sun, 08 Feb 2004 13:14:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i18LEPKO030079 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:14:25 -0800 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i18LEIb22290; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:14:18 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i18LEIa26540; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:14:18 -0500 Received: from cheetah.davemloft.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i18LDjkC015752; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:13:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 13:14:17 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Julian Anastasov Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours Message-Id: <20040208131417.4f8693de.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 3121 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: davem@redhat.com Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 391 Lines: 13 On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 22:44:05 +0200 (EET) Julian Anastasov wrote: > Comments? This is a dicey situation in that when the entry does become valid this does not trigger a proxy arp by us, does it? I guess the original requestor will redo the request, so I'm just mentioning this in passing. This is an area where admittedly I'm not well versed. So proxy ARP experts speak up :)