Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:51:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from yue.hongo.wide.ad.jp (yue.hongo.wide.ad.jp [203.178.135.30]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i2J6oaKO009122 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:50:36 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yue.hongo.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F6B33CE6; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:52:14 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:52:14 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040319.155214.101331883.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> To: davem@redhat.com Cc: mashirle@us.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, xma@us.ibm.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]dump interface IPv6 multicast/anycast addresses through netlink From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20040318220647.3dbb9c43.davem@redhat.com> References: <200403171130.30282.mashirle@us.ibm.com> <20040318220647.3dbb9c43.davem@redhat.com> Organization: USAGI Project X-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/ X-Fingerprint: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.yoshifuji.org/%7Ehideaki/hideaki@yoshifuji.org.asc X-Face: "5$Al-.M>NJ%a'@hhZdQm:."qn~PA^gq4o*>iCFToq*bAi#4FRtx}enhuQKz7fNqQz\BYU] $~O_5m-9'}MIs`XGwIEscw;e5b>n"B_?j/AkL~i/MEaZBLP X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1 (AOI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 4122 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 696 Lines: 18 In article <20040318220647.3dbb9c43.davem@redhat.com> (at Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22:06:47 -0800), "David S. Miller" says: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:30:30 -0800 > Shirley Ma wrote: > > > This patch is against Linux 2.6.4 kernel. It has been tested, 'ip' utility > > works fine. This patch is used by IPv6 MIBs. > > Are we really going to support adding anycast/multicast addresses using > RTM_NEW{MULTI,ANY}CAST rtmsgs? If not, let's not add them. > > Otherwise I like your patch. I think we'd like to do so (for anycast at least). -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA