Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list netdev); Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.osdl.org (fire.osdl.org [65.172.181.4]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j29LtaPj025351 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:55:36 -0800 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j29LtCqi030676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:55:12 -0800 Received: from dxpl.pdx.osdl.net (dxpl.pdx.osdl.net [172.20.1.103]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j29LtCPY023425; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:55:12 -0800 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 13:55:30 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Francois Romieu Cc: Andi Kleen , netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot Message-ID: <20050309135530.5c5c80b6@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> In-Reply-To: <20050309214023.GA9502@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20050309112925.7f7900ab@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050309214023.GA9502@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Organization: Open Source Development Lab X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: &@E+xe?c%:&e4D{>f1O<&U>2qwRREG5!}7R4;D<"NO^UI2mJ[eEOA2*3>(`Th.yP,VDPo9$ /`~cw![cmj~~jWe?AHY7D1S+\}5brN0k*NE?pPh_'_d>6;XGG[\KDRViCfumZT3@[ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass (domain of shemminger@osdl.org designates 65.172.181.6 as permitted sender) X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.104 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/757/Tue Mar 8 15:14:36 2005 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 2765 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: shemminger@osdl.org Precedence: bulk X-list: netdev Content-Length: 387 Lines: 14 On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:40:23 +0100 Francois Romieu wrote: > Andi Kleen : > [...] > > Hmm? It doesn't support DAC? > > It does but it is unstable for everybody (except Jon Mason, go figure) on > amd64. > > Stephen, on which kind of system was this change tested ? I tested on old Celeron with Netgear card. I could try Amd and/or Xeon if you want.