Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list ogl-sample); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 05:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marilyn1.kirchgruppe.de (marilyn.shop.intervox.de [193.101.184.4])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g8ACbJtG003944
	for <ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 05:37:20 -0700
Received: by marilyn1.kirchgruppe.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8ACfjL08365
	for ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:41:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from localhost) by marilyn1.kirchgruppe.de (MSCAN) id 4/marilyn1.kirchgruppe.de/smtp-gw/mscan; Tue Sep 10
     14:41:45 2002                                                                                                      
Message-ID: <3D7DE64F.2E378E07@BetaResearch.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:32:15 +0200
From: Sven Panne <Sven_Panne@BetaResearch.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ogl-sample@oss.sgi.com
Subject: SI license
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-archive-position: 2
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: ogl-sample-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: ogl-sample-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: Sven_Panne@BetaResearch.de
Precedence: bulk
X-list: ogl-sample

I have a small non-technical question about the license of the SI:
Would it be OK to use the SI's man pages as a basis for the online
documentation of my open source OpenGL binding for Haskell?
(http://haskell.org/HOpenGL) I had a look a the "SGI Free Software
License B", but without being a lawyer it is a bit hard to tell.  BTW,
the project uses literate programming to automatically generate the
API documentation from the Haskell sources, so there is no real
"separate" documentation for the binding, if this is of any legal
significance...

Cheers,
   S.