Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:51:46 -0800 Received: from mailgate.igd.fhg.de ([192.44.32.11]:43250 "EHLO mailgate.igd.fhg.de") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:51:31 -0800 Received: from HeinrichSchiff.igd.fhg.de ([153.97.150.5]) by mailgate.igd.fhg.de (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA16C7 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:50:45 +0100 Received: from hokusai.igd.fhg.de.igd.fhg.de (hokusai.igd.fhg.de [146.140.4.36]) by HeinrichSchiff.igd.fhg.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA08831 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:51:24 +0100 (MET) From: Dirk Reiners Received: by hokusai.igd.fhg.de.igd.fhg.de (980427.SGI.8.8.8/SMI-4.0) id TAA78483; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:50:17 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:50:17 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <1010109195016.ZM1254496@hokusai.igd.fhg.de> X-Face: "`A\#m^;_fF4zDC3eD@[pKCui5i.FQgNnQRYt[l7o[*M0tF5*@vI$(t1;}B+~t;s\&esfOu+<3\Lg/y"wyG]w'Z"K4j0-[u-~jw^D7{I;7BUU'hvnvF:~O1KGjjRoHO9/]5.@Y>~[v:km#3+c|+Rlk{LP"S~TunjL7MoGUMeTlJD?ciwXYP X-Orcpt: rfc822;stp-outgoing Hello everybody, I have a (probably stupid) question, but I need to know anyway. We want to build an asymmetric network, a bunch clients with 100 MBit connected to a Switch, whose GBit uplink is connected to a master. Now if we're using STP on this, will it benefit from the firmware in the GBit master or not? If STP is wrapped in TCP on the 100 MBit side it probably wouldn't, but if it creates real STP packets it might. Any comments on this situation? Has anybody tried something similar, with what results? We need to broadcast data from the master and collect data from all the clients quickly, and STP seems like a good idea to reduce overhead and latency. Thanks Dirk -- -- -- Dirk Reiners reiners@igd.fhg.de, Dirk.Reiners@gmx.net -- OpenSG Forum http://www.opensg.org -- Rundeturmstrasse 6 http://www.igd.fhg.de/~reiners -- D-64283 Darmstadt All standard disclaimers apply. -- Truth is stranger than fiction because fiction has to make sense.