Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:41:14 -0800 Received: from conceptbrowser.net ([216.112.5.40]:1866 "EHLO galois.atypon.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:41:05 -0800 Received: from [10.1.1.197] ([10.1.1.197]) by galois.atypon.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA24531 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:39:57 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: petro@10.1.1.10 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <14562.44287.39273.95483R@gibble.americas.sgi.com> References: <200003291619.KAA22984@fsgi344.americas.sgi.com> <10003300954.ZM7142@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <14562.42090.314696.82332B@gibble.americas.sgi.com> <10003301105.ZM7400@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <14562.44287.39273.95483R@gibble.americas.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:40:08 -0800 To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com From: "Christopher C. Petro" Subject: Re: Things todo before we announce Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing >At Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:05:54 -0500, >Nathan Scott wrote: >The point I was getting at: >We shouldn't pollute the system with stuff people can't >distinctly remove; not util xfs it more accecpted. > >A lot of people are going to try xfs initially but >not really do much with it. On the contrary, as soon as XFS is stable enough to use, I'm going to put it on a development machine. We have this project where we are working with about 10 million 2k files, some directories having over 65k entries. -- We have only come here seeking knowledge Things they would not teach us of in college.--The Police http://www.atypon.com petro@atypon.com