Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:52:52 -0700 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com ([204.94.214.22]:27500 "EHLO pneumatic-tube.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:52:47 -0700 Received: from ledzep.cray.com (ledzep.cray.com [137.38.226.97]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id IAA03067 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:56:31 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mostek@sgi.com) Received: from ironwood-e185.americas.sgi.com (ironwood.cray.com [128.162.185.212]) by ledzep.cray.com (SGI-SGI-8.9.3/craymail-smart-nospam1.0) with ESMTP id KAA32842; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:51:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fsgi344.americas.sgi.com (fsgi344.americas.sgi.com [128.162.184.15]) by ironwood-e185.americas.sgi.com (8.8.4/SGI-ironwood-e1.4) with ESMTP id KAA13158; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:51:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Jim Mostek Received: by fsgi344.americas.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/SGI-client.1.6) id KAA34171; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:51:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200004031551.KAA34171@fsgi344.americas.sgi.com> Subject: Re: XFS as Root To: pongheng@starnet.gov.sg (Tan Pong Heng) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:51:28 -0500 (CDT) Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <38E6AF73.7ABF49D6@starnet.gov.sg> from "Tan Pong Heng" at Apr 02, 2000 10:24:51 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing You are pushing XFS more than we have internally. We have more development yet to do. We don't feel comfortable enough with XFS to use it as /usr or any other normal file system, yet. During our testing, we normally mkfs a fresh copy, beat on it, fix, ... Thanks, Jim > >OK, I tried the alternative - I now have XFS as /usr instead. >Everything seems to be fine. It seems that the only problem with >using XFS as root is to get the right process going before init start. >(Or so I am guessing....) > >There is one catch though - I am not having /usr/src/linux on this >partition yet - as that is on my home directory for CVS update >at the moment - that would be /home. > >Anything specific that you would like me to test? >