Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S42243AbQGVFcG>;
	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:32:06 -0700
Received: from lips.borg.umn.edu ([160.94.232.50]:58895 "EHLO
        lips.borg.umn.edu") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S42236AbQGVFbh>;
	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 22:31:37 -0700
Received: from thebarn.com (nic-25-c125-118.mn.mediaone.net [24.25.125.118])
	by lips.borg.umn.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e6M5VC177664;
	Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:31:12 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <3979319F.7B172BE5@thebarn.com>
Date:   Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:31:12 -0500
From:   Russell Cattelan <cattelan@thebarn.com>
Reply-To: cattelan@thebarn.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:     Nathan Scott <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Problems compiling
References: <200007220132.UAA27268@jen.americas.sgi.com> <10007221231.ZM9218@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing

Nathan Scott wrote:

I just redid the way the tree is synced.
Delete the files whenever... if things work better they should disappear from the
cvs tree... if not I get out the hand dany rm and start the tree from scratch.
It isn't a bunch of work most of the process is automated.


> hi,
>
> > ...
> > I cannot reproduce your problem with the current 2.4.0-test1-xfs
> > source.  I am running from the SGI p_tools tree, not CVS, I wonder if
> > CVS is out of sync.  It is puzzling that the Rules.make:75 and
> > fs/xfs/Makefile:93 lines have nothing to do with target xfs.o.
> > ...
>
> If the cvs tree needs to be remade, could someone let me know
> beforehand please - I have several files I'd like to remove at
> some point.
>
> thanks.
>
> (these dup jdm ones still, and a few more too now...)
>
> --- Forwarded mail from <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> ("Nathan Scott")
>
> From: "Nathan Scott" <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:27:18 -0500
> To: cattelan@thebarn.com
> Subject: (Fwd) TAKE - jdm.[ch]
>
> g'day Russell,
>
> I have a number of these duplicate jdm.[ch] files which I'd
> like to remove from the tree - can you suggest a time that
> I can do it which wont break the process which pushes source
> to oss?
>
> thanks.
>
> --- Forwarded mail from nathans@snort (Nathan Scott)
>
> Date:   Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:14:30 +1000 (EST)
> From: nathans@snort (Nathan Scott)
> To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
> Subject: TAKE - jdm.[ch]
>
> Modid:  2.4.0-test1-xfs:slinx:67118a
> Date:  Tue Jul 18 21:12:24 PDT 2000
> Workarea:  snort:/build4/nathans/base-2.4.0-test1-xfs
> Author:  nathans
>
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.0-test1-xfs
>
> cmd/xfs/bstat/Makefile - 1.6
> cmd/xfs/bstat/xfs_bstat.c - 1.4
> cmd/xfs/fsr/Makefile - 1.2
> cmd/xfs/fsr/fsr_xfs.c - 1.2
> cmd/xfs/handle/Makefile - 1.4
> cmd/xfs/include/handle.h - 1.2
> cmd/xfs/handle/jdm.c - 1.1
> cmd/xfs/include/jdm.h - 1.1
>         - rationalise all of the jdm.[ch] files such that tools use one
>           version of these two files (by linking with libhandle.a).
>
> ---End of forwarded mail from nathans@snort (Nathan Scott)
>
> --
> Nathan
>
> ---End of forwarded mail from <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> ("Nathan Scott")
>
> --
> Nathan

--
Russell Cattelan
cattelan@thebarn.com