Received:  by oss.sgi.com id <S553760AbQKVAfE>;
	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:35:04 -0800
Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:54290 "EHLO
        deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id <S553679AbQKVAef>;
	Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:34:35 -0800
Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via SMTP id QAA07570
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:26:37 -0800 (PST)
	mail_from (nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com)
Received: from wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.55.135]) by larry.melbourne.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA21837; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:33:13 +1100
Received: (from nathans@localhost) by wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA57674; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:33:11 +1100 (EDT)
From:   "Nathan Scott" <nathans@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Message-Id: <10011221133.ZM124976@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2000 11:33:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: Danny <danscox@mindspring.com>
        "Re: XFS ACL Patch" (Nov 16,  5:50pm)
References: <200011161859.MAA12613@jen.americas.sgi.com> 
	<3A1464C9.F3027609@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To:     dcox@connex.com
Subject: Re: XFS ACL Patch
Cc:     linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing

hi Danny,

On Nov 16,  5:50pm, Danny wrote:
> Subject: Re: XFS ACL Patch
> ...
> 	Okay, here's a patch which should be much happier!  It's against
> test10, and seems to work on my system.
> 
> 	I've corrected the problems Steve mentioned, and ran diff properly (I
> think).  Please try it, and let me know what you think.
> 

apologies for not getting back to you sooner - your patch
should make its way into the tree in the next few days,
modulo a few minor changes.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan